Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

15. Revisit terms "owner" and "value holder" #178

Open
kirtchev-adacore opened this issue Jul 28, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

15. Revisit terms "owner" and "value holder" #178

kirtchev-adacore opened this issue Jul 28, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@kirtchev-adacore
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@jonas-schievink jonas-schievink mentioned this issue Sep 30, 2022
Merged
bors-ferrocene bot added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 30, 2022
@bors-ferrocene
Merge #327
ffb3e51 
327: Remove the term "value holder" r=kirtchev-adacore a=jonas-schievink

Part of #178 (not yet sure what to do about "owner")

Since only local variables participate in initialization tracking, and ownership, but the term *value holder* includes consts and statics, the term is incorrect here.

This is still inaccurate, since borrows and initialization is tracked on a per-field basis in some cases, but already an improvement.

Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@kirtchev-adacore