-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unexpected fluctuation in total emissivity before the temperature T=1000 K #12
Comments
Hi @gforney, Could you help me? |
This may take us some time to look at. We do not run RADCAL off line very often. Please be patient. |
@drjfloyd can you take a look at this? Does stand alone RADCAL actually give a continuous function EMISSIVITY(T)? It is not clear to me where the blue line comes from versus where the black dots come from. |
ahsadeghi, Where did the blue line and the black dots come from? Is the blue line FDS or are you running RADCAL? Can you attach the input you are using? |
I run Radcal for different temperatures and then plot this (as I explained in the question topic). |
Do you know how Radcal calculates SNB parameters at the temperatures other than the FTIR experiment temperatures? In which part of the code it is? |
None of the current development team were part of the development of RADCAL. The original RADCAL source and the theory manual for RADCAL can be found here: https://github.com/firemodels/radcal If you ran RADCAL as a standalone code using the RADCAL namelist format can you attach the input file you used. |
Hi,
The values for total emissivity have some unexpected fluctuations and bumps before the temperature 1000 K with the relative minimums at the temperatures where the experimental data were reported [Wakatsuki, 2005]. Does anyone know why it happens and where it is calculated or interpolated? Please see the attached figure for gas Heptane for total emissivity which is calculated by ((1-total_transmissivity)).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: