Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update: libxml2 #1673

Open
dongsupark opened this issue Mar 4, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

update: libxml2 #1673

dongsupark opened this issue Mar 4, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
advisory security advisory cvss/HIGH > 7 && < 9 assessed CVSS security security concerns

Comments

@dongsupark
Copy link
Member

dongsupark commented Mar 4, 2025

Name: libxml2
CVEs: CVE-2024-56171, CVE-2025-24928, CVE-2025-27113
CVSSs: 7.8, 7.8, 2.9
Action Needed: update to >= 2.12.10, >= 2.13.6

Summary:

  • CVE-2024-56171: libxml2 before 2.12.10 and 2.13.x before 2.13.6 has a use-after-free in xmlSchemaIDCFillNodeTables and xmlSchemaBubbleIDCNodeTables in xmlschemas.c. To exploit this, a crafted XML document must be validated against an XML schema with certain identity constraints, or a crafted XML schema must be used.
  • CVE-2025-24928: libxml2 before 2.12.10 and 2.13.x before 2.13.6 has a stack-based buffer overflow in xmlSnprintfElements in valid.c. To exploit this, DTD validation must occur for an untrusted document or untrusted DTD. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2017-9047.
  • CVE-2025-27113: libxml2 before 2.12.10 and 2.13.x before 2.13.6 has a NULL pointer dereference in xmlPatMatch in pattern.c.

refmap.gentoo: CVE-{2024-56171,2025-24928}, https://bugs.gentoo.org/949914, CVE-2025-27113: TBD

@dongsupark dongsupark added advisory security advisory security security concerns labels Mar 4, 2025
@dongsupark dongsupark moved this from 📝 Needs Triage to 🪵Backlog in Flatcar tactical, release planning, and roadmap Mar 4, 2025
@dongsupark dongsupark added the cvss/HIGH > 7 && < 9 assessed CVSS label Mar 4, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
advisory security advisory cvss/HIGH > 7 && < 9 assessed CVSS security security concerns
Projects
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant