Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GL2ROrbitClosure enhancements #292

Open
videlec opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

GL2ROrbitClosure enhancements #292

videlec opened this issue Jul 9, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@videlec
Copy link
Collaborator

videlec commented Jul 9, 2024

  • starting from a guess (absolute) tangent space $V \subset H^1(M; \mathbb{R})$ there are two purely algebraic ingredients that could be used to make it bigger
    • the field of definition must be totally real. So one could pick the largest totally real subfield of the field of definition of $V$ and use it as a starting field. (question: (efficient) computation of this field?)
    • the final $V_\infty$ must satisfy that for any field automorphism of $\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$ either $V_\infty = V_\infty^\sigma$ or $V_\infty$ and $V_\infty^\sigma$ are disjoint. So if we find a $\sigma$ such that $V \cap V^\sigma$ is a non-trivial proper subspace of $V$ then we can start with $V' = V + V^\sigma$.
  • if we deal with unfoldings, one can use the $\pi_1$ of configuration spaces acting on cohomology (see also Use symmetries in GL(2,R)-orbit closure computation #35).
@videlec
Copy link
Collaborator Author

videlec commented Jul 11, 2024

Note: to compute the largest totally real sub-field of a given number field, Aurel said that it is almost in PARI/GP. What is there is about CM fields but could be modified to handle totally real. A reasonable option seems to enumerate all sub-fields and pick the maximal degree totally real one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants