Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can't open .flatpakref files with Warehouse #76

Open
Xrey274 opened this issue Dec 8, 2023 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #177
Open

Can't open .flatpakref files with Warehouse #76

Xrey274 opened this issue Dec 8, 2023 · 3 comments · May be fixed by #177
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Xrey274
Copy link

Xrey274 commented Dec 8, 2023

Currently using Solus Budgie, everything up to date. Inside of nautilus you can open files with the "Open With." option, where you can choose what program to run/open the file with. Sadly Warehouse doesn't appear on this list, i think it's not creating some kind of references that you can be used to open flatpakref files directly.

@heliguy4599
Copy link
Member

That's correct, I do not currently have anything in Warehouse that would make this possible. It's a feature I have in mind to add but am not entirely sure how to just yet. Thanks.

@heliguy4599 heliguy4599 added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 9, 2023
@bleonard252
Copy link

Warehouse now offers an "open file" option in its menu. It should be trivial to reuse that for this, right?

(Also, tangentially, how hard would it be to accept Appstream URLs, i.e. from the Flatline browser extension, and look them up in the Install Packages page?)

@brunos3d brunos3d linked a pull request Jan 30, 2025 that will close this issue
4 tasks
@brunos3d
Copy link

Hello, folks.
Here is my PR helping to implement this feature, hope it helps.

#177

cc: @heliguy4599 @bleonard252 @Xrey274

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants