Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs(disco): add warning about SID and en-route discontinuity #888

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Sep 12, 2023

Conversation

Valastiri
Copy link
Member

Summary

Discussion in discord #docs channel over SID and en-route discontinuities. This PR clarifies with a new warning information why deleting discontinuities is something that should not be done lightly.

Reference:

Location

  • docs/pilots-corner/advanced-guides/flight-planning/disco.md

Discord username (if different from GitHub):
valastiri

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 9, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 9, 2023 0:18am

Copy link
Collaborator

@Sleinmaster Sleinmaster left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Additionally to the structural topics discussed in discord.

!!! danger ""
There are some important things to note why you shouldn't normally clear a discontinuity:

- Turn radius between the two waypoints where the discontinuity is present
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- Turn radius between the two waypoints where the discontinuity is present
- Narrow turn radii between the two waypoints, where the discontinuity is present, which could not be flown by the plane

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added the word realistically

which could not be realistically flown by the plane


- Turn radius between the two waypoints where the discontinuity is present
- Understanding the different [Leg Types](leg-types.md) and if they are compatible to be conneted together
- Even if the waypoints form a direct line, it's not inherently completely safe to remove a discontinuity unless you understand the above points
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
- Even if the waypoints form a direct line, it's not inherently completely safe to remove a discontinuity unless you understand the above points
- Even if the waypoints form a direct line, it's not inherently safe to remove a discontinuity unless you understand the above points

Use inherently or completely, but not both.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

chose completely

Co-authored-by: Sleinmaster <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Review Required PR Check Label label Sep 12, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit e09926b into flybywiresim:primary Sep 12, 2023
5 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants