Skip to content

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Nov 10, 2025

Bumps typescript-eslint from 8.46.2 to 8.46.3.

Release notes

Sourced from typescript-eslint's releases.

v8.46.3

8.46.3 (2025-11-03)

🩹 Fixes

  • eslint-plugin: [no-misused-promises] expand union type to retrieve target property (#11706)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-duplicate-enum-values] support signed numbers (#11722, #11723)

❤️ Thank You

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

Changelog

Sourced from typescript-eslint's changelog.

8.46.3 (2025-11-03)

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [typescript-eslint](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/tree/HEAD/packages/typescript-eslint) from 8.46.2 to 8.46.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/main/packages/typescript-eslint/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/commits/v8.46.3/packages/typescript-eslint)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: typescript-eslint
  dependency-version: 8.46.3
  dependency-type: direct:development
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Contributor Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Nov 10, 2025

Labels

The following labels could not be found: dependencies. Please create it before Dependabot can add it to a pull request.

Please fix the above issues or remove invalid values from dependabot.yml.

@dependabot dependabot bot requested a review from flyingrobots as a code owner November 10, 2025 11:40
@github-actions
Copy link

🔍 The Case of Pull Request #361

🕵️ SHA-lock HOLMES's Investigation (click to expand)

🕵️ SHA-lock HOLMES Investigation

  • Generated: 2025-11-10T11:40:47.506Z
  • Commit SHA: 064bb94
  • Bundle Version: 2.0.0

⚠️ Evidence valid only for commit 064bb94

🔍 Executive Deduction

"Watson, after careful examination of the evidence, I deduce..."

Weighted Completion: ██████░░░░ 60.0%
Scores: SCS 60.0% · TCI 70.0% · MRI 20.0%
Verification Status: 2 claims verified
Ship Verdict: REQUIRES INVESTIGATION

🧩 SCS Breakdown

Component Score Coverage
Sql 60.0% 0.60/1.00
Types 60.0% 0.60/1.00
Validation 60.0% 0.60/1.00
Tests 70.0% 0.70/1.00

🧪 TCI Breakdown

Component Score Coverage Note
Unit Constraints 70.0% 1/1 N/A
Unit Rls 0.0% N/A
Integration Relations 0.0% N/A
E2e Ops 0.0% Not tracked in quick emit mode

⚠️ MRI Breakdown

Component Risk Share Points Count
Drops 100.0% 20 0
Renames Without Uid 0.0% 0 0
Add Not Null Without Default 0.0% 0 0
Non Concurrent Indexes 0.0% 0 0

📊 The Weight of Evidence

"Observe, Watson, how not all features carry equal importance..."

Element Weight Status Evidence Deduction
schema 5 ✅ SQL & tests out/schema.sql:1-9999@064bb94 Elementary!

🚪 Security & Performance Gates

"Elementary security measures, Watson..."

Gate Status Evidence Holmes's Ruling
Migration Risk MRI: 20.0% "Acceptable risk"
Test Coverage ⚠️ TCI: 70.0% "Insufficient coverage"
Sensitive Fields 0 fields "All secured"

📋 The Verdict

⚠️ REQUIRES FURTHER INVESTIGATION
"Some clues remain unclear. Address the noted issues."

Signed and sealed,

  • S. Holmes, Consulting Detective

[END OF INVESTIGATION FOR COMMIT 064bb94]


🩺 Dr. WATSON's Verification (click to expand)

🩺 Dr. Watson's Independent Verification Report

Medical Examination of Evidence

  • Examination Date: 2025-11-10T11:41:30.523Z
  • Patient SHA: 064bb94

🔬 Citation Verification

"Let me examine each piece of evidence independently..."

  • Citations Examined: 2
  • Verified: 0 ✅
  • Failed: 0 ❌
  • Unable to Verify: 2

Verification Rate: 0.0%

📊 Mathematical Verification

"I shall recalculate Holmes's arithmetic..."

Holmes claimed SCS: 60.0%
Watson calculates: 100.0%
Difference: ⚠️ Significant

🔍 Consistency Analysis

"Checking for contradictions in Holmes's deductions..."

✅ No logical inconsistencies detected

🩺 Dr. Watson's Medical Opinion

VERIFICATION: CONCERNS NOTED ⚠️

"While Holmes's methods are generally sound, I have noted some"
"discrepancies that warrant further investigation."

Respectfully submitted,

  • Dr. J. Watson, M.D.
    Medical Examiner & Verification Specialist

🔮 Professor MORIARTY's Predictions (click to expand)

🧠 Professor Moriarty's Temporal Predictions

The Mathematics of Inevitability

  • Analysis Date: 2025-11-10T11:42:02.296Z

🔮 Current State

SCS: ██████░░░░ 60.0%
TCI: ███████░░░ 70.0%
MRI: 20.0% risk

📈 Velocity Analysis

SCS Velocity: +0.00%/day
Git Activity (window): 24h · commits 1 (0 relevant) · ~1.00 commits/day
↳ Magnitude: ~0 relevant LOC/day across ~0.0 files/day
Activity Index: 2 / 100 (PR 0, Window 4)
Blended Velocity: +0.01%/day
Commit Size Burstiness: 0 / 100 (higher = more uneven commit sizes)
⚠️ PLATEAU DETECTED - Low SCS movement and low recent Git activity.

⏰ Completion Predictions

ETA: Cannot predict (insufficient velocity)

"At current velocity, completion is... improbable."

🧪 Readiness EXPLAIN

  • SCS ≥ 80% → FAIL ❌ (actual 60.0%)
  • TCI ≥ 70% → PASS ✅ (actual 70.0%)
  • MRI ≤ 40% → PASS ✅ (actual 20.0%)
  • CI Stability ≥ 90% (branch main) → FAIL ❌ (actual 78% over ~168h)
  • Delivery context (last 168h): 0 issues closed · 0 PRs merged (informational, not gating)

Signals blend: SCS velocity (70%) + Git activity (30%, branch-first). Activity only suppresses false plateaus; it never inflates readiness.

📊 Historical Trajectory

11-10: ██████░░░░ 60.0%
11-10: ██████░░░░ 60.0%
11-10: ██████░░░░ 60.0%

"Every problem becomes elementary when reduced to mathematics"
— Professor Moriarty


Machine-readable reports: holmes-report.json · watson-report.json · moriarty-report.json (see workflow artifacts).


Filed at 221B Repository Street

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant