-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 670
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Core feature] limit-namespace
should be a limit-namespaces
to accept list of namespaces
#5181
Comments
#take |
Hey @MortalHappiness! 🚀 I've thoroughly reviewed your suggestion regarding the Given the dependency on #5087, I'll ensure to keep a close eye on that issue's progress to align our updates accordingly. Your initiative to propose this enhancement is highly appreciated, and it's clear you've done your homework by ensuring this issue hasn't been raised before and adhering to our Code of Conduct. I'll start drafting the necessary changes and plan out the implementation strategy. Your insight has been invaluable, and I look forward to seeing this improvement come to life. If you have any more suggestions or need further clarification, feel free to reach out. Thanks for contributing to making our project even better! 🌟 Best,
|
Resolves: flyteorg#5181 Signed-off-by: Chi-Sheng Liu <[email protected]>
Resolves: flyteorg#5181 Signed-off-by: Chi-Sheng Liu <[email protected]>
Resolves: flyteorg#5181 Signed-off-by: Chi-Sheng Liu <[email protected]>
Motivation: Why do you think this is important?
As @ByronHsu mentioned in #5087 (comment), now the
limit-namespace
config only accepts a single namespace. It should be a list of strings to accept multiple namespaces instead of only a single namespace.Goal: What should the final outcome look like, ideally?
Rename
limit-namespace
tolimit-namespaces
and change its type fromstring
to[]string
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A
Propose: Link/Inline OR Additional context
This issue depends on #5087
Are you sure this issue hasn't been raised already?
Have you read the Code of Conduct?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: