Add dependency review gh workflow

[eapolinario]

Why are the changes needed?

We can leverage an integrated github workflow to disallow certain software licenses.

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Define a new gh workflow using https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action?tab=readme-ov-file#configuration-options to disallow GPL dependencies.

How was this patch tested?

Setup process

Screenshots

Check all the applicable boxes

• I updated the documentation accordingly.
• All new and existing tests passed.
• All commits are signed-off.

Related PRs

Docs link

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 36.80%. Comparing base (8890b38) to head (6225ebc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5902      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   36.81%   36.80%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1309     1309              
  Lines      130899   130899              
==========================================
- Hits        48185    48178       -7     
- Misses      78532    78539       +7     
  Partials     4182     4182              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests-datacatalog	51.58% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteadmin	54.01% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
unittests-flytecopilot	11.73% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytectl	62.40% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteidl	6.92% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flyteplugins	53.57% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytepropeller	43.00% <ø> (ø)
unittests-flytestdlib	55.39% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.