trouble and telescope workflow

[b1nhack]

I noticed that trouble and telescope have some same use cases, such as lsp_definitions.
So, what is the recommended workflow, and should I use trouble to jump to lsp_definitions?
This way telescope has more segmented responsibilities and is only used for fuzzy search of data.

[pannapudi]

I've only found one integration between two plugins. It redirect diagnostics from telescope window into trouble link to config
But it doesn't work if I ask Trouble to show diagnostics first.

[b1nhack]

Trouble can directly display the diagnostics
https://github.com/b1nhack/nvim/blob/aa4e920cb7f0b76f63ef00c0fbc0e11839531334/lua/plugins/trouble.lua#L66

[b1nhack]

Currently I use Trouble for a lot of lsp operations, Telescope is only used as a Fuzzy finder.
Especially after the #450 fix.
In my opinion, Telescope is good for finding what you want from a large amount of data.
Trouble has a better interface to display lsp_definitions and so on.

[folke]

If I want to go somewhere, I use Telescope.
If I need to review a lot of locations/diagnostics I use Trouble.

I also frequently do searches with Telescope that I then open in Trouble to go through one by one.

[b1nhack]

The third item explains a use case for integration with Telescope.
I found a bunch of things I wanted, and I need to deal with them one by one.