You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
Analysis failed with a 'spawn ENAMETOOLONG' error.
To Reproduce
When right-clicking on the 'classes' folder, or selecting all class files and right-clicking, I choose 'SFDX: Scan selected files of folders with Code Analyzer'. However, this generates an error 'Analysis failed: spawn ENAMETOOLONG'.
Expected behavior
For the scan to complete successfully and print any violations identified.
Screenshots
Desktop (please complete the following information):
OS: Windows 10 Enterprise
Browser: Chrome
Version: 116.0.5845.188 (Official Build) (64-bit)
VS Code Version: 1.81.1
Salesforce Code Analyzer VS Code Extension Version: 0.1.1
"Workaround": No workaround to do this in VS Code.
"Urgency": Not business-stopping, but renders the functionality almost pointless as I don't want to do this on a class by class basis.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is still a problem. Is there any news on when this will be resolved, when a work around or a fix will be provided. We have a project with hundreds of classes and so we hit this issue as it tries to run on a folder and the resulting expanded line is too long. Checking 100's of files one by one is simply not feasible and makes this tool unusable in automated situations.
Describe the bug
Analysis failed with a 'spawn ENAMETOOLONG' error.
To Reproduce
When right-clicking on the 'classes' folder, or selecting all class files and right-clicking, I choose 'SFDX: Scan selected files of folders with Code Analyzer'. However, this generates an error 'Analysis failed: spawn ENAMETOOLONG'.
Expected behavior
For the scan to complete successfully and print any violations identified.
Screenshots
Desktop (please complete the following information):
"Workaround": No workaround to do this in VS Code.
"Urgency": Not business-stopping, but renders the functionality almost pointless as I don't want to do this on a class by class basis.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: