Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider defining dominant strategies in addition to weakly dominant ones #23

Open
clange opened this issue Sep 3, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

Consider defining dominant strategies in addition to weakly dominant ones #23

clange opened this issue Sep 3, 2013 · 0 comments
Assignees
@clange
Labels
enhancement isabelle theory

Comments

@clange
Copy link
Member

clange commented Sep 3, 2013

Discuss (e.g. with @rowatc) whether in SingleGoodAuctionProperties.thy we should, in addition to weakly dominant strategies, also define dominant ones. If so, we can refactor the definitions in some way to make them less redundant.
@ghost ghost assigned clange Sep 3, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@clange clange

Labels
enhancement isabelle theory
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@clange