From 9797104bd1e34a9170de41f7c084bbf9a2bfdb5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Friendly Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 22:11:03 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] add 'typical' note --- 10-mlm-review.qmd | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/10-mlm-review.qmd b/10-mlm-review.qmd index d51ebd93..9f61b5e9 100644 --- a/10-mlm-review.qmd +++ b/10-mlm-review.qmd @@ -374,6 +374,8 @@ fathers were assessed on three subscales of a *Perceived Parenting Competence Sc The dataset `Parenting` comprises 60 fathers selected from three `group`s of $n = 20$ each: (a) fathers of a child with _no disabilities_; (b) fathers with a _physically_ disabled child; (c) fathers with a _mentally_ disabled child. The design is thus a three-group MANOVA, with three response variables. +NOTE: Use **typical** rather than "normal" + The main questions concern whether the group means differ on these scales, and the nature of these differences. That is, do the means differ significantly on all three measures? Is there a consistent order of groups across these three aspects of parenting?