-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NanoHat on OpenWRT #3
Comments
Hello,
I need to compile NanoHAT support into my own openwrt tree.
Can you provide just the code patch instead of the binary?
Thanks,
Ben
…On 12/14/2018 12:07 AM, Anthony Lee wrote:
try LBPanel
https://github.com/DonAnthonyLee/LBPanel_LBKit/tree/master/binary/sun50i-h5/openwrt-image
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAR2qlBIlrpemOgVEULIzO2HeZYIsygmks5u41xDgaJpZM4Yhf1l>.
--
Ben Greear <[email protected]>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
|
Hello,
I found some other source code in your github project, but
it is not clear to me how to use it.
Normally for OpenWRT, you would create a Makefile that would allow
OpenWRT build system to download the appropriate source code and
build it.
For instance, here is a patch that I did to support a realtek USB
NIC in OpenWRT (and the NEO2).
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1013206/
If you can create a patch like this, then maybe it can be accepted into
the official OpenWRT project so more people can use it!
Thanks,
Ben
…On 12/14/2018 05:25 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
Hello,
I need to compile NanoHAT support into my own openwrt tree.
Can you provide just the code patch instead of the binary?
Thanks,
Ben
On 12/14/2018 12:07 AM, Anthony Lee wrote:
> try LBPanel
>
> https://github.com/DonAnthonyLee/LBPanel_LBKit/tree/master/binary/sun50i-h5/openwrt-image
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAR2qlBIlrpemOgVEULIzO2HeZYIsygmks5u41xDgaJpZM4Yhf1l>.
>
--
Ben Greear ***@***.***>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAR2qmwpw3_R9w5hnloKEVH3VjaplZsfks5u46bMgaJpZM4Yhf1l>.
--
Ben Greear <[email protected]>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
|
And he's never to be heard form again. He could've helped get OLED to work on OpenWrt for everybody with a NEO2 board, but as it stands now everybody with one and running OpenWrt is out of luck. I also can't do anything with the sources on his repo. Would be great if this was merged or could be merged in OpenWrt codebase. But I /guess it'll never happen like so many things. OSS is really a selfish place sometimes. Once it works for me I don't care about anyone else. Even though me succeeding greatly depended on works others freely shared with me. Sick and tired of it. |
It works now. Depends: kmod-i2c-core kmod-i2c-gpio kmod-i2c-gpio-custom kmod-i2c-smbus python-pillow python-smbus |
Hello,
I have OpenWRT booting up on the neo2, but I am not having any luck figuring out how to get the NanoHat OLED to work or be discovered by the kernel. I suspect I may be missing a driver or something like that? Can you let me know what (if any) patches are needed to the kernel, and what kernel options need to be enabled to compile support for the NanoHat OLED? I'll try to get the fixes accepted into OpenWRT so other users will have an easier time....
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: