Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

reuse lint-file does not work for me #1073

Closed
dibog opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

reuse lint-file does not work for me #1073

dibog opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@dibog
Copy link

dibog commented Sep 13, 2024

Here is the reuse version I'm using

> pip show reuse
Name: reuse
Version: 4.0.3
Summary: reuse is a tool for compliance with the REUSE recommendations.
Home-page: https://reuse.software/
Author: Free Software Foundation Europe
Author-email: [email protected]
License: Apache-2.0 AND CC0-1.0 AND CC-BY-SA-4.0 AND GPL-3.0-or-later
Location: XXXX
Requires: attrs, binaryornot, boolean.py, Jinja2, license-expression, python-debian, tomlkit
Required-by:

When I try to test reuse lint-file I get this message:

> reuse lint-file
usage: reuse [-h] [--debug] [--suppress-deprecation] [--include-submodules] [--include-meson-subprojects] [--no-multiprocessing] [--root PATH]
             [--version]
             {annotate,download,lint,spdx,supported-licenses,supported-licences,convert-dep5} ...
reuse: error: argument {annotate,download,lint,spdx,supported-licenses,supported-licences,convert-dep5}: invalid choice: 'lint-file' (choose from 'annotate', 'download', 'lint', 'spdx', 'supported-licenses', 'supported-licences', 'convert-dep5')

It seems this command switch is not available in v4.0.3?

Is it a planned feature, but not yet released?

@stephanlachnit
Copy link

Is it a planned feature, but not yet released?

Yes: #1055 (comment)

@carmenbianca
Copy link
Member

Yes, sorry, the README on the main branch is not exactly representative of the current release. Please see https://reuse.readthedocs.io/en/stable/readme.html for a more accurate README.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants