AggregateSvPileup
should account for inaccurate split-read breakpoint positions
#13
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Currently
AggregateSvPileup
merges breakpoints that have left and right breakpoints within a distance threshold of each other, regardless of the type of read evidence of the breakpoints: split-read (breakpoint occurs inside sequenced read) or read-pair (breakpoint occurs in the unsequenced insert between mates).However, these two types of evidence have different precision of the breakpoint position and should use different distance thresholds. While split-read evidence is likely to point to a very precise position, the position for a read-pair event can be off by as much as the inner distance (insert size minus read lengths). Something similar to the following procedure should be used instead:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: