Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hashing the text instead of dictionary keys #41

Open
CosminC3 opened this issue Jun 17, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Hashing the text instead of dictionary keys #41

CosminC3 opened this issue Jun 17, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@CosminC3
Copy link

Hi,

I used some of your code to make some very good dictionaries in one of my apps.
Thank you very much.

Now I have a different situation: dictionaries for multiple (automated/confirmation) find&replace.
They can be strings of any kind: Any (upcase/lowcase) letter, number 0..9 or even chars not found in words.

Usualy there are a large number of searches on large rtfs - and only a few replacements.
So it seems a text hashing (instead of dictionary key hashing) would be a lot faster.

Do you have some advices/hints on how to do that?

Thank you.

Kind regards,
Cosmin

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant