You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I used some of your code to make some very good dictionaries in one of my apps.
Thank you very much.
Now I have a different situation: dictionaries for multiple (automated/confirmation) find&replace.
They can be strings of any kind: Any (upcase/lowcase) letter, number 0..9 or even chars not found in words.
Usualy there are a large number of searches on large rtfs - and only a few replacements.
So it seems a text hashing (instead of dictionary key hashing) would be a lot faster.
Do you have some advices/hints on how to do that?
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Cosmin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I used some of your code to make some very good dictionaries in one of my apps.
Thank you very much.
Now I have a different situation: dictionaries for multiple (automated/confirmation) find&replace.
They can be strings of any kind: Any (upcase/lowcase) letter, number 0..9 or even chars not found in words.
Usualy there are a large number of searches on large rtfs - and only a few replacements.
So it seems a text hashing (instead of dictionary key hashing) would be a lot faster.
Do you have some advices/hints on how to do that?
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Cosmin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: