Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Durability percentage is really "designed for" durability, not the vendor's SLA #17

Open
jgannon opened this issue Aug 30, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Durability percentage is really "designed for" durability, not the vendor's SLA #17

jgannon opened this issue Aug 30, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@jgannon
Copy link
Contributor

jgannon commented Aug 30, 2016

Since AWS, Google, and MSFT SLAs don't pay out credits for durability issues, it might be helpful to call out the durability column as a "designed for" percentage vs. a true SLA (with associated service credits).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@jgannon