Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
74 lines (72 loc) · 17.2 KB

bibliography.en.adoc

File metadata and controls

74 lines (72 loc) · 17.2 KB
Raw

References

  • Amid C, Alako BT, Balavenkataraman Kadhirvelu V, Burdett T, Burgin J, Fan J, Harrison PW, Holt S, Hussein A, Ivanov E & Jayathilaka S (2020) The European Nucleotide Archive in 2019. Nucleic acids research 48(D1): D70-D76. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz1063

  • Andersen K, Bird KL, Rasmussen M, Haile J, Breuning-Madsen H, Kjaer KH, Orlando L, Gilbert MTP and Willerslev E (2012) Meta-Barcoding of ‘Dirt’ DNA from Soil Reflects Vertebrate Biodiversity. Molecular Ecology 21(8): 1966–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05261.x

  • Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Wheeler DL (2006) GenBank, Nucleic Acids Research, 34(1): D16–D20, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj157

  • Berry O, Jarman S, Bissett A, Hope M, Paeper C, Bessey C, Schwartz MK, Hale J & Bunce M (2021) Making environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity records globally accessible. Environmental DNA, 3(4), 699-705. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.173

  • Bessey C, Jarman SN, Berry O et al. (2020) Maximizing fish detection with eDNA metabarcoding. Environmental DNA: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.74

  • Biggs J, Ewald N, Valentini A, Gaboriaud C, Dejean T, Griffiths RA, Foster J, et al. (2015) Using eDNA to Develop a National Citizen Science-Based Monitoring Programme for the Great Crested Newt (Triturus cristatus). Biological Conservation 183: 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.029

  • Blaxter M, Mann J, Chapman T, Thomas F, Whitton C, Floyd R & Abebe E (2005) Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360(1462): 1935-1943. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1725

  • Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR et al. (2019) Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol 37: 852–857. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9

  • Boussarie G, Bakker J, Wangensteen OS, Mariani S, Bonnin L, Juhel JB, Kiszka JJ, Kulbicki M, Manel S, Robbins WD & Vigliola L (2018) Environmental DNA illuminates the dark diversity of sharks. Science Advances 4(5): eaap9661. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aap9661

  • Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, …​ & Wittwer CT (2009). The MIQE Guidelines: Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797

  • Callahan B, McMurdie P & Holmes S (2017) Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. The ISME Journal 11: 2639–2643. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.119

  • Callahan B, McMurdie P, Rosen M et al. (2016) DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13, 581–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869

  • Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph (2021) The Global Taxonomy Initiative 2020: A Step-by-Step Guide for DNA Barcoding. Technical Series No. 94. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, 66 pp. https://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-ts-94-en.pdf

  • Convention on Biological Diversity (2020) Report of the ad hoc Technical Expert Group on Digital Sequence Information On Genetic Resources, 17-20 March 2020. Montreal, Canada. https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/ba60/7272/3260b5e396821d42bc21035a/dsi-ahteg-2020-01-07-en.pdf

  • Debroas D, Domaizon I, Humbert JF, Jardillier L, Lepère C, Oudart A & Taïb N (2017) Overview of freshwater microbial eukaryotes diversity: a first analysis of publicly available metabarcoding data. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 93(4): fix023. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fix023

  • Doi H, Fukaya K, Oka SI, Sato K, Kondoh M & Miya M (2019) Evaluation of Detection Probabilities at the Water-Filtering and Initial PCR Steps in Environmental DNA Metabarcoding Using a Multispecies Site Occupancy Model. Scientific Reports 9(1): 3581. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40233-1

  • Durkin L, Jansson T, Sanchez M, Khomich M, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Nilsson RH (2020) When mycologists describe new species, not all relevant information is provided (clearly enough). MycoKeys 72: 109-128. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.72.56691

  • Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST, Bioinformatics 26(19): 2460–2461, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461

  • Ekrem T & Majaneva M (2019) DNA-Metastrekkoding Til Undersøkelser Av Invertebrater I Ferskvann. NTNU Vitenskapsmuseet Naturhistorisk Notat. https://ntnuopen.ntnu.no/ntnu-xmlui/handle/11250/2612638.

  • Elbrecht V & Leese F (2015) Can DNA-based ecosystem assessments quantify species abundance? Testing primer bias and biomass—sequence relationships with an innovative metabarcoding protocol. PLoS ONE 10(7): e0130324. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130324

  • Ficetola GF, Miaud C, Pompanon F, & Taberlet P (2008). Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biology letters, 4(4), 423-425. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0118

  • Fossøy F, Brandsegg H, Sivertsgård R, Pettersen O, Sandercock BK, Solem Ø, Hindar K & Tor AM (2019) Monitoring Presence and Abundance of Two Gyrodactylid Ectoparasites and Their Salmonid Hosts Using Environmental DNA. Environmental DNA. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.45.

  • Frøslev TG, Kjøller R, Bruun HH et al. (2017) Algorithm for post-clustering curation of DNA amplicon data yields reliable biodiversity estimates. Nat Commun 8, 1188 . https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01312-x

  • Groom Q, Güntsch A, Huybrechts P, Kearney N, Leachman S, Nicolson N, Page RDM, Shorthouse DP, Thessen, AE, Haston E. People are essential to linking biodiversity data. 2020. Database 2020:baaa072 https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baaa072.

  • Hernandez C, Bougas B, Perreault‐Payette A, Simard A, Côté G, & Bernatchez L (2020). 60 specific eDNA qPCR assays to detect invasive, threatened, and exploited freshwater vertebrates and invertebrates in Eastern Canada. Environmental DNA, 2(3): 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.89

  • Hofstetter, V, Buyck, B, Eyssartier, G, Schnee S, Gindro K (2019) The unbearable lightness of sequenced-based identification. Fungal Diversity 96, 243–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-019-00428-3

  • Huggett JF, Foy CA, Benes V, Emslie K, Garson JA, Haynes R, …​ & Bustin SA (2013). The Digital MIQE Guidelines: M inimum I nformation for Publication of Q uantitative Digital PCR E xperiments. Clinical chemistry, 59(6), 892-902. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2013.206375

  • Hugerth LW, Andersson AF (2017) Analysing Microbial Community Composition through Amplicon Sequencing: From Sampling to Hypothesis Testing. Frontiers in Microbiology 8: 1561. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01561

  • Knudsen SW, Ebert RB, Hesselsøe M, Kuntke F, Hassingboe J, Mortensen PB, Thomsen PF et al (2019) Species-Specific Detection and Quantification of Environmental DNA from Marine Fishes in the Baltic Sea. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 510: 31–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2018.09.004

  • Lacoursière-Roussel A, Rosabal M & Bernatchez L (2016) Estimating Fish Abundance and Biomass from eDNA Concentrations: Variability among Capture Methods and Environmental Conditions. Molecular Ecology Resources 16(6): 1401–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12522

  • Leebens-Mack J, Vision T, Brenner E, Bowers JE, Cannon S, Clement MJ, Cunningham CW, DePamphilis C, DeSalle R, Doyle JJ & Eisen JA (2006) Taking the first steps towards a standard for reporting on phylogenies: Minimum Information About a Phylogenetic Analysis (MIAPA). Omics: a journal of integrative biology 10(2): 231-237. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2006.10.231

  • Leinonen R, Sugawara H, Shumway M & International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (2011) The sequence read archive. Nucleic Acids Research 39(suppl_1): D19-D21. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq1019

  • Mahé F, Rognes T, Quince C, de Vargas C, Dunthorn M. (2014) Swarm: robust and fast clustering method for amplicon-based studies. PeerJ 2:e593 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.593

  • McDonald D, Clemente JC, Kuczynski J, Rideout JR, Stombaugh J, Wendel D, …​ & Caporaso JG (2012). The Biological Observation Matrix (BIOM) format or: how I learned to stop worrying and love the ome-ome. Gigascience, 1(1), 2047-217X. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-217X-1-7

  • Miralles A, Bruy T, Wolcott K, Scherz MD, Begerow D, Beszteri B, Bonkowski M, Felden J, Gemeinholzer B, Glaw F & Glöckner FO (2020) Repositories for Taxonomic Data: Where We Are and What is Missing. Systematic Biology: syaa026. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaa026

  • Mora C, Tittensor DP, Adl S, Simpson AG & Worm B (2011) How many species are there on Earth and in the ocean? PLoS Biology 9(8): e1001127. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001127

  • Nilsson RH, Tedersoo L, Abarenkov K, Ryberg M, Kristiansson E, Hartmann M, Schoch CL, Nylander JA, Bergsten J, Porter TM & Jumpponen A (2012) Five simple guidelines for establishing basic authenticity and reliability of newly generated fungal ITS sequences. MycoKeys 4: 37-63. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.4.3606

  • Nilsson RH, Larsson KH, Taylor AFS, Bengtsson-Palme J, Jeppesen TS, Schigel D, Kennedy P, Picard K, Glöckner FO, Tedersoo L, Saar I, Kõljalg U, Abarenkov K (2019) The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications. Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 47, Issue D1, D259–D264. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1022

  • Ogram A, Sayler GS, Barkay T (1987) The Extraction and Purification of Microbial DNA from Sediments. Journal of Microbiological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7012(87)90025-x.

  • Ovaskainen O, Schigel D, Ali-Kovero H et al. (2013) Combining high-throughput sequencing with fruit body surveys reveals contrasting life-history strategies in fungi. The ISME Journal 7: 1696–1709. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.61

  • Parks, DH, Chuvochina, M, Chaumeil, P, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P (2020) A complete domain-to-species taxonomy for Bacteria and Archaea. Nat Biotechnol 38, 1079–1086. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0501-8

  • Pearson, WR & Lipman DJ (1988) Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 85(8): 2444-2448. https://dx.doi.org/10.1073%2Fpnas.85.8.2444

  • Penev P, Mietchen D, Chavan VS, Hagedorn G, Smith VS, Shotton D, Tuama ÉÓ, Senderov V, Georgiev T, Stoev P, Groom QJ, Remsen D, Edmunds SC (2017) Strategies and guidelines for scholarly publishing of biodiversity data. Research ideas and outcomes 3: e12431, https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12431

  • Pietramellara G, Ascher J, Borgogni F, Ceccherini MT, Guerri G & Nannipieri P (2009) Extracellular DNA in Soil and Sediment: Fate and Ecological Relevance. Biology and Fertility of Soils 45: 219-235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-008-0345-8.

  • Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN (2007) BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System. Molecular Ecology Notes, 7: 355-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x

  • Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN (2013). A DNA-based registry for all animal species: the Barcode Index Number (BIN) system. PloS one, 8(7), e66213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066213

  • Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F (2016) VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ, 4, e2584. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2584

  • Ruppert KM, Kline RJ, Rahman MS (2019). Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: A systematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA. Global Ecology and Conservation, 17, e00547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00547

  • Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, …​ & Weber CF (2009). Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Applied and environmental microbiology, 75(23), 7537-7541. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01541-09

  • Shea MM, Kuppermann J, Rogers MP, Smith DS, Edwards P & Boehm AB (2023) Systematic review of marine environmental DNA metabarcoding studies: toward best practices for data usability and accessibility. PeerJ, 11, p.e14993. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14993

  • Sigsgaard EE, Jensen MR, Winkelmann IE, Møller PR, Hansen MM, Thomsen PF (2020). Population‐level inferences from environmental DNA—Current status and future perspectives. Evolutionary Applications, 13(2), 245-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12882

  • Somervuo P, Koskela S, Pennanen J, Nilsson RH, Ovaskainen O (2016) Unbiased probabilistic taxonomic classification for DNA barcoding. Bioinformatics 32(19):2920–2927, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw346

  • Strand DA, Johnsen SI, Rusch JC, Agersnap S, Larsen WB, Knudsen SW, Møller PR & Vrålstad T (2019) Monitoring a Norwegian Freshwater Crayfish Tragedy: eDNA Snapshots of Invasion, Infection and Extinction. Journal of Applied Ecology 56(7): 1661-1673. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13404.

  • Taberlet P, Bonin A, Coissac E & Zinger L (2018) Environmental DNA: For Biodiversity Research and Monitoring. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767220.001.0001

  • Taberlet P, Coissac E, Hajibabaei M & Rieseberg LH (2012) Environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology 21(8): 1789–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05542.x

  • Takahara T, Minamoto T, Yamanaka H, Doi H & Kawabata Z (2012) Estimation of Fish Biomass Using Environmental DNA. PLoS ONE 7(4): e35868. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035868

  • Tedersoo, L, Bahram M, Puusepp R, Nilsson RH & James TY (2017) Novel soil-inhabiting clades fill gaps in the fungal tree of life. Microbiome 5: 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-017-0259-5

  • Tedesco PA, Bigorne R, Bogan AE, Giam X, Jézéquel C & Hugueny B (2014) Estimating how many undescribed species have gone extinct. Conservation Biology 28(5): 1360-1370. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12285

  • Thalinger B, Deiner K, Harper LR, Rees HC, Blackman RC, Sint D, …​ & Bruce K (2021). A validation scale to determine the readiness of environmental DNA assays for routine species monitoring. Environmental DNA. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.27.063990

  • Thomsen PF, Kielgast JOS, Iversen LL, Wiuf C, Rasmussen M, Gilbert MTP Orlando L & Willerslev E (2012) Monitoring Endangered Freshwater Biodiversity Using Environmental DNA. Molecular Ecology 21(11): 2565–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05418.x

  • Thomsen PF, Møller PR, Sigsgaard EE, Knudsen SW, Jørgensen OA & Willerslev E (2016) Environmental DNA from Seawater Samples Correlate with Trawl Catches of Subarctic, Deepwater Fishes. PLoS ONE 11(11): e0165252. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165252

  • Thomsen PF & Willerslev E (2015) Environmental DNA – An Emerging Tool in Conservation for Monitoring Past and Present Biodiversity. Biological Conservation 183: 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.019

  • Tyson, GW & Hugenholtz, P (2005). Environmental shotgun sequencing. Encyclopedia of genetics, genomics, proteomics, and bioinformatics. Edited by Lynn B. Jorde. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.1386-1391. https://doi.org/10.1002/047001153X.g205313

  • Valentini A, Taberlet P, Miaud C, Civade R, Herder J, Thomsen PF, Bellemain E et al. (2016) Next-Generation Monitoring of Aquatic Biodiversity Using Environmental DNA Metabarcoding. Molecular Ecology 25(4): 929–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13428

  • Wacker S, Fossøy F, Larsen BM, Brandsegg H, Sivertsgård R, & Karlsson S (2019). Downstream transport and seasonal variation in freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) eDNA concentration. Environmental DNA, 1(1), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.10

  • Wilkinson M, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg I et al. (2016) The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3: 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

  • Wittwer C, Stoll S, Strand D, Vrålstad T, Nowak C, & Thines M (2018). eDNA-based crayfish plague monitoring is superior to conventional trap-based assessments in year-round detection probability. Hydrobiologia, 807(1), 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-017-3408-8

  • Yates MC, Fraser DJ & Derry AM (2019) Meta‐analysis Supports Further Refinement of eDNA for Monitoring Aquatic Species‐specific Abundance in Nature. Environmental DNA. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.7.

  • Yilmaz P, Kottmann R, Field D, Knight R, Cole JR, Amaral-Zettler L, Gilbert JA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Johnston A, Cochrane G & Vaughan R (2011) Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications. Nature Biotechnology 29(5): 415. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1823