You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First off, thanks for sharing your complete code, which has been more than helpful for my current research.
Observation: It was rather challenging to have identified this issue. In particular, I noted that evaluating on a different machine than training produces unrealistically high Dice and HD95 metrics. Evaluation results, however, remain reproducible on the same machine.
Problem: According to this post, the return of glob.glob is arbitrary. Indeed, I could confirm that the return of glob.glob in line 247 is different on different machine, although on the same machine it seems to consistently reproduce the same ordering.
Could you share your data split in the paper so that we can reproduce your results? Thanks in advance for your time and attention.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'll add that it seems to be dependent on the file system. If the machine access a shared directory containing the data, then the training split is reproducible. Otherwise, if different machines have different copies of data (i.e., potentially different metadata), they do not in general output the same glob.glob() results.
First off, thanks for sharing your complete code, which has been more than helpful for my current research.
Observation: It was rather challenging to have identified this issue. In particular, I noted that evaluating on a different machine than training produces unrealistically high Dice and HD95 metrics. Evaluation results, however, remain reproducible on the same machine.
Problem: According to this post, the return of
glob.glob
is arbitrary. Indeed, I could confirm that the return ofglob.glob
in line 247 is different on different machine, although on the same machine it seems to consistently reproduce the same ordering.Could you share your data split in the paper so that we can reproduce your results? Thanks in advance for your time and attention.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: