You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Pursuant to my struggles in issue #2497 and following the advice of @msl3v, I decided to work from fullchem in order to quantify the difference in loss rates of C2H6 by species in the fullchem and carbon mechanisms. To do this, I added two tracers to custom.eqn: C2H6X (a tracer created solely by the reaction of C2H6 + NO3) and C2H6Y (a tracer created solely by the reaction of C2H6 + Br). Additionally, I added three PORL families to custom.kpp: LC2H6, PC2H6X, and PC2H6Y. I figured that between these three metrics, I could back out the reaction rate I'm interested in and compare it with the same information in the carbon gases sim.
Unfortunately, this has proved more difficult than expected. As I understand it, the steps involved in my plan were these:
Add the tracers and PORL families to the custom kpp mechanism, in the files specified above (custom.eqn and custom.kpp).
Add all five species to species_database.yml, with C2H6X/Y as basically copies of ethane and the PORL terms as copies of LCH4
Add C2H6X/Y to geoschem_config.yml (strictly speaking I don't think this one ought to be necessary, since I don't care about transport of these species, only their production. The bug occurs with or without them there).
Add C2H6X/Y and the PORL species to the restart file.
Quaff the nectar of victory while my code runs and I solve all my problems.
Something has broken down between steps 4 and 5, and when I run the code, I keep getting the following error:
===============================================================================
QFYAML ERROR: Could not open YAML file for output!
-> at QFYAML_Print (in qfyaml_mod.F90)
===============================================================================
===============================================================================
GEOS-Chem ERROR: Error encountered in routine "Init_Species_Database"!
-> at Init_State_Chm (in module Headers/state_chm_mod.F90)
===============================================================================
===============================================================================
GEOS-Chem ERROR: Error encountered within call to "Init_State_Chm"!
-> at GC_Init_StateObj (in GeosCore/gc_environment_mod.F90)
===============================================================================
===============================================================================
GEOS-CHEM ERROR: Error encountered in "GC_Init_StateObj!"!
STOP at -> at GEOS-Chem (in GeosCore/main.F90)
===============================================================================
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference.
Backtrace for this error:
#0 0x1511218b55af in ???
#1 0xa65b1f in __hco_driver_mod_MOD_hco_final
at /users/5/brewe222/old_home/GC_Rundirs/TrackEthaneLoss/CodeDir/src/HEMCO/src/Core/hco_driver_mod.F90:359
#2 0x4a986c in __hco_interface_gc_mod_MOD_hcoi_gc_final
at /users/5/brewe222/old_home/GC_Rundirs/TrackEthaneLoss/CodeDir/src/GEOS-Chem/GeosCore/hco_interface_gc_mod.F90:1236
#3 0x4504a3 in __emissions_mod_MOD_emissions_final
at /users/5/brewe222/old_home/GC_Rundirs/TrackEthaneLoss/CodeDir/src/GEOS-Chem/GeosCore/emissions_mod.F90:394
#4 0x42c6e0 in cleanup_
at /users/5/brewe222/old_home/GC_Rundirs/TrackEthaneLoss/CodeDir/src/GEOS-Chem/GeosCore/cleanup.F90:123
#5 0x86d126 in __error_mod_MOD_geos_chem_stop
at /users/5/brewe222/old_home/GC_Rundirs/TrackEthaneLoss/CodeDir/src/GEOS-Chem/GeosUtil/error_mod.F90:523
#6 0x86d45f in __error_mod_MOD_error_stop
at /users/5/brewe222/old_home/GC_Rundirs/TrackEthaneLoss/CodeDir/src/GEOS-Chem/GeosUtil/error_mod.F90:437
#7 0x409295 in geos_chem
at /users/5/brewe222/old_home/GC_Rundirs/TrackEthaneLoss/CodeDir/src/GEOS-Chem/Interfaces/GCClassic/main.F90:512
#8 0x4035d6 in main
at /users/5/brewe222/old_home/GC_Rundirs/TrackEthaneLoss/CodeDir/src/GEOS-Chem/Interfaces/GCClassic/main.F90:32
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
What are the steps to reproduce the bug?
This error continues to occur regardless of whether I add the information to fullchem or custom, and notably gets no more informative when I run in DEBUG mode instead of standard. All I can figure out is that reading in a yaml file is failing. The most obvious culprit seems to me to be species_database.yml based on that error, but reverting this to the unmodified file does not fix the bug.
So it seems like it's something wrong with my KPP additions but it claims to be failing at reading in a yaml file. Of course, there's not a yaml file in KPP. So I'm not at all sure how to proceed here. Do you see a particular mistake in my logic chain that might have lead me here? Or perhaps you've seen an error like this before?
Thanks,
Jared
Please attach any relevant configuration and log files.
I have solved this problem! The issue was in the simulation settings in geoschem_config.yml, specifically the setting of species_metadata_output_file, which by default is set like so: species_metadata_output_file: OutputDir/geoschem_species_metadata.yml.
I had changed this output directory path (species_metadata_output_file: OutputDir_CEDS/geoschem_species_metadata.yml) and then much later deleted the directory path OutputDir_CEDS. That's why the error seemed related to species_database.yml but wasn't impacted by which version of the species database I used. I'm not sure if this is worth adding a more specific error message to - the original QFYAML ERROR: Could not open YAML file for output was not specific which YAML was failing to write - but I have found a New And Exciting Failure Case for you, and I'm writing it here for future confused googlers to find.
Your name
Jared Brewer
Your affiliation
University of Minnesota
What happened? What did you expect to happen?
Pursuant to my struggles in issue #2497 and following the advice of @msl3v, I decided to work from fullchem in order to quantify the difference in loss rates of C2H6 by species in the fullchem and carbon mechanisms. To do this, I added two tracers to
custom.eqn
: C2H6X (a tracer created solely by the reaction of C2H6 + NO3) and C2H6Y (a tracer created solely by the reaction of C2H6 + Br). Additionally, I added three PORL families tocustom.kpp
: LC2H6, PC2H6X, and PC2H6Y. I figured that between these three metrics, I could back out the reaction rate I'm interested in and compare it with the same information in the carbon gases sim.Unfortunately, this has proved more difficult than expected. As I understand it, the steps involved in my plan were these:
custom.eqn
andcustom.kpp
).species_database.yml
, with C2H6X/Y as basically copies of ethane and the PORL terms as copies of LCH4Something has broken down between steps 4 and 5, and when I run the code, I keep getting the following error:
What are the steps to reproduce the bug?
This error continues to occur regardless of whether I add the information to fullchem or custom, and notably gets no more informative when I run in DEBUG mode instead of standard. All I can figure out is that reading in a yaml file is failing. The most obvious culprit seems to me to be
species_database.yml
based on that error, but reverting this to the unmodified file does not fix the bug.So it seems like it's something wrong with my KPP additions but it claims to be failing at reading in a yaml file. Of course, there's not a yaml file in KPP. So I'm not at all sure how to proceed here. Do you see a particular mistake in my logic chain that might have lead me here? Or perhaps you've seen an error like this before?
Thanks,
Jared
Please attach any relevant configuration and log files.
custom.eqn.txt
custom.kpp.txt
geoschem_config.yml.txt
species_database.yml.txt
What GEOS-Chem version were you using?
14.1.1
What environment were you running GEOS-Chem on?
Local cluster
What compiler and version were you using?
gcc 8.2.0
Will you be addressing this bug yourself?
Yes
In what configuration were you running GEOS-Chem?
GCClassic
What simulation were you running?
Full chemistry
As what resolution were you running GEOS-Chem?
2x2.5
What meterology fields did you use?
MERRA-2
Additional information
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: