-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
Catalogs management
Below some examples of some relevant catalogs to test during the ongoing developments:
-
CKAN catalogs not compliant with the DCAT-AP_IT profile:
Bari http://opendata.comune.bari.it/
Basilicata http://dati.regione.basilicata.it/
Umbria http://dati.umbria.it/
Marche http://goodpa.regione.marche.it/
Veneto http://dati.veneto.it/
-
CKAN catalogs not compliant with the DCAT-AP_IT profile which expose json file (data.json DCAT JSON harvester):
Genova http://dati.comune.genova.it/data.json
Lombardia https://www.dati.lombardia.it/data.json —> qui mi si impalla tutto l’harvesting ma so che stanno lavorando per rendersi conformi al profilo!
-
CKAN catalogs with several problems on Tags:
Regione Sardegna (several errors on tags, 801 dataset, only the half part can be currently harvested due to the exsisting issues on tags validation), http://opendata.regione.sardegna.it/
Lombardia (https://www.dati.lombardia.it/data.json)
The involved tags are mainly in geospatial data (same problem for Sardegna, Bolzano and Trentino)
-
Good RDF catalogs:
Camera di Commercio di Macerata (http://www.mc.camcom.it/uploaded/linked-open-data/dcat-opendata-catalog.rdf)
Protezione Civile (http://dati.protezionecivile.it/geoportalOD/GetCatalogXSL)
Regione Piemonte (ha qualche errorino ancora ma dipende da loro http://api.smartdatanet.it/metadataapi/api/dcat/dataset_list?opendata=true&tenant=regpie&rows=1000&linkedData=true&outputFormat=turtle)