Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add remote sign to reasonable event kinds #3226

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 28, 2024

Conversation

alexgleason
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the changes you have made in this PR

When I select "Let's be reasonable", Alby should not prompt me to sign kind 24133 "remote sign" events (NIP-46).

Screenshot from 2024-08-17 12-11-49

Why?

Kind 24133 is merely a transport mechanism. I still have to sign the actual event separately. Let me give an example. Say the server wants me to remote sign a kind 1 event. I first have to call window.nostr.signEvent(kind1) with the kind 1. This will trigger Alby to check whether I am allowed to sign a kind 1. Then I will need to encode the signed event into a kind 24133, and make a separate call to Alby like window.nostr.signEvent(kind24133). But by that point I have already signed the kind 1 and handed it off to the client, so wrapping it in a transport event is inconsequential because it could be transported any other way.

Another example: the server wants me to remote sign a kind 5 (deletion request). Kind 5 is not considered a "reasonable event kind" by Alby. Because I have to sign this event before creating a kind 24133, I will have to call window.nostr.signEvent(kind5) first, which will create the Alby popup, prompting me to approve the deletion. Then, if I approve it, it doesn't matter if I subsequently wrap that event in a kind 24133, because any damage that could be done by the kind 5 is done more easily by just submitting it to relays.

The important security step is whether I was prompted to sign the inner event (kind 1 / kind 5), not the transport event (kind 24133).

With the current UX, I am seeing complaints like this: https://ditto.pub/@[email protected]/posts/a9f83c843c6901d645735c28af9956e458f2c4d19e86735cb396f3921262b252

If you use a nip-07 extension to log in, there will be a lot of pop ups until you select always allow for a bunch of the event types. After that everything is smooth.

So I think this event kind should be considered "reasonable" since it has no security implications on its own. It's just a transport mechanism.

Type of change

(Remove other not matching type)

  • fix: Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Checklist

  • Self-review of changed code
  • Manual testing
  • Added automated tests where applicable
  • Update Docs & Guides
  • For UI-related changes
  • Darkmode
  • Responsive layout

@pavanjoshi914
Copy link
Contributor

thanks for the pr. tAck

@pavanjoshi914 pavanjoshi914 merged commit 530b7ce into getAlby:master Aug 28, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants