Support reStructuredText

[LuoZijun]

Hi, have plan to support reStructuredText ?

A rust lib: https://github.com/flying-sheep/rust-rst

[Keats]

I don't think this crate is an useable state.

This is a duplicate of #32

To be honest on a choice of alternate format, I wouldn't really add rst if I had the choice, AsciiDoc does seem superior but it doesn't have a parser in Rust either. The implementation in Zola would have to come from someone other than me as well as this is a huge change that I wouldn't really use myself.

[polyzen]

I don't think this crate is an useable state.

Doesn't seem so:
flying-sheep/rust-rst#4
https://github.com/flying-sheep/rust-rst/search?q=TODO&unscoped_q=TODO

AsciiDoc does seem superior

rST seems vastly more popular, but I'm biased being such a big fan. Will have to take a closer look at AsciiDoc.

[Keats]

Doesn't seem so:

The last version on crates.io is 3 years old and even master doesn't have docs for the library itself so as a user it isn't useable.

[LuoZijun]

reStructuredText 支持的特性其实更多，并且有一个统一完整的标准和规范。

相比较来讲，Markdown 的规范则很分散，并且也不太完整。比如 contents 这样的特性，或者是一些 Metadata 之类的，都需要你自己重新定义和实现（比如这个项目里面使用 +++ ... +++ 来实现一个 Metadata ）。

reStructuredText supports more features and has a unified and complete standard and specification. By comparison, the Markdown specification is fragmented and less complete.

Features like ' contents ', or something like ' Metadata ', need to be redefined and implemented yourself (such as the use of ' + + + ... + + + ' in this project to achieve a ' Metadata ').

-- From Bing Translate

[Keats]

I moved the feature request to the forum: https://zola.discourse.group/t/alternative-input-formats/76

[piedoom]

just a heads up that discourse provides a voting plugin for feature requests which might interest you.