Add Pause Assitant

[mdsandu]

pause flow:
Main text: Our community reports that Ghostery breaks this site. We recommend pausing it temporarily.
Additional text: Ads and trackers will not be blocked.

OK
Site works fine

revoke flow:
Our community reports that Ghostery no longer breaks this site. Resume Ghostery.
OK
another button?

We’re so glad Ghostery has your heart! Let others know—leave a review!
OK
Skip this time

[mdsandu]

deflecting the breakage from Ghostery and towards all ad blockers:

pause flow:
main text:
"The Ghostery community reports that ad blockers break this site. We recommend pausing Ghostery temporarily."
Additional text: "Ads and trackers will not be blocked."
OK
Site works fine

revoke flow:
"The Ghostery community reports that ad blockers no longer break this site. Resume Ghostery."

[mdsandu]

Copy we agreed upon with JP today:

main text:
Ghostery users report that ad blockers break this site. Try pausing Ghostery. (if we are 100% sure)
Ghostery users report that ad blockers may be breaking this site. Try pausing Ghostery. (less sure)
additional text: Ads and trackers will not be blocked.
OK
Dismiss. Site works fine

revoke flow:
Ghostery users report that ad blockers are no longer breaking this site. Resume Ghostery.

thoughts to copy:
from the new suggestions I made based on his feedback Jp favors "Try" as we can ask for feedback later - which we do
community is overused, and do you really feel part of a community at G?, so Ghostery users is just fine
pause is temporary action - so pleonasm and we can drop it

lemme know what you think, team!
thanks
Diana

[smalluban]

We don't have a signal for the difference "100% sure" from "less sure", so I put the first one - we will likely use the feature for obvious (and spread) failures.

[mdsandu]

:) I think you didn't understand it @smalluban no two options needed. we might phrase it differently (blanket) based on how sure engineering is that the page is broken by us/ad blockers and this system works

here is the slight difference:
break this site
may be breaking

[smalluban]

I know what you meant. However, we have to choose one text, as the current implementation of remote config does not give information about whether it is broken 100% or might be broken - we can't create that logic in the current iteration (or we would have to change remote config - I think this is not worth it for now).