-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 137
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Problem with seismic refraction field data inversion compatability #781
Comments
Note that there is only ONE position list, not separately for shots and geophones. The beginning of your file
seems to denote the first three shot positions and then the geophones, so the data section should start like
followed by the yellow one
ending with
|
I guess this is more or less a repetition of #777 ?
|
So probably we could just enable setting the columns to be used (or any other |
I've created a new function |
My call is
|
Hello Dr. Thank you so much for paying this much attention to my problem. Your first guidance on this issue fixed my problem and made my dataset readable by the package. I am going to try out the new function to load my data, and I will inform you about how it went. |
Now, I have two 2D inversion models for ERT and SRT. To integrate my models, I use fuzzy c-means and k-means clustering. Can you give me any guidance about that? |
hello, I am trying to conduct a seismic refraction field data inversion. the dataset belongs to a landslide area. I have 8 shots that in my dataset are not given properly.it appears that the first 8 points in my shot/geophone points are considered as shot positions therefore I cant get my far shots and the shot locations are not correct.
I have a dataset and the first pick plots that I put in this issue for you to take a look at. using this dataset I am getting this odd plot below:
and here is my dataset:
khodeshe.xlsx
Also I expect my model to be sth like below:
I am using jupyter notebook as my environment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: