[js] Should multiple FFI imports compile to a single ESM re-export?

[hayleigh-dot-dev]

Currently when compiling a Gleam module with multiple external fns from the same source, we compile to multiple import/export pairs:

import { from } from "./ref.ffi.js";
export { from };

import { get } from "./ref.ffi.js";
export { get };

import { set } from "./ref.ffi.js";
export { set };

import { update } from "./ref.ffi.js";
export { update };

This can actually be reduced to just one line using ESM re-exports, resulting in:

export { from, get, set, update } from "./ref.ffi.js";

I'm not sure whether this is a tangible win or not, I believe imports are cached so it's not like you'd hit the network multiple times with the current approach and it's nice to have the compiled module more-or-less follow the order of declaration that the original source did.

[lpil]

Yes, definitely. This makes much nicer looking code
#1170

[lpil]

Locking this as it is implemented! Thank you

[lpil]

Hmm that did not do what I expected it to do.