You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While this is NOT legal advice, however from looking at this repo my guess is that the source files are released under gpl2+ and the binary is released under Simplified BSD. The funny part is if you were to compile the binary yourself then you are not allowed to release it under Simplified BSD. Its perfectly legit as far as I am aware for the copyright holder (i.e.) the author to do this however. I can only presume that his intentions were that anyone can use the binary however they want (BSD License) but If they want to edit the sources and republish them or the resulting binary they have to do it under GPL2+. Why anyone would do this, your guess is as good as mine. Id have just chosen the LGPL 2 or 3 in this case.
Under what license is the
jxrlib
project being released, please?In #21 I see references to
Simplified BSD
andGPL 2+
andpom.xml
and*.java
files.But I see no dedicated LICENSE file somewhere around.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: