Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[feature request] use legacy kind of agents to run on the new environment #97

Open
vitoque-git opened this issue Oct 6, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@vitoque-git
Copy link

vitoque-git commented Oct 6, 2021

Use legacy kind of agents to run on the new environment.

It seems that what you want to achieve is not supported, the structure is different. The main problem as I see it is that the observation state is constructed differently, so the "new" state can not be directly given to the "legacy" agent. But even if this is resolved, still need to write wrappers to fit the structure. Maybe it is worth doing this work. You can open an issue on the github.

https://www.kaggle.com/c/lux-ai-2021/discussion/276419#1535771

@glmcdona
Copy link
Owner

glmcdona commented Oct 6, 2021

Agreed. Writing a wrapper to the traditional agent.py is a great idea. That way these agents can be ported over without any work.

I'm working on the replay output feature right now, and I'll work on this next unless someone else takes on this work.

@vitoque-git
Copy link
Author

Any news on this? I know you guys are really busy, but it would be awesome to have something

@glmcdona
Copy link
Owner

glmcdona commented Oct 27, 2021

@vitoque-git , sorry for the delay. Could I learn a bit more about what you are looking for? Do you have an official format python agent, and you'd like to simulate games faster to measure success rate faster or similar? Or do you have an official format python agent structured for RL with the kaggle environment wrapper, and you'd like to port it over?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants