We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I don't have enough experience in WN yet to suggest which synset this should belong to.
The lemma "fun" exists in WN as a partOfSpeech noun but the adjective form does not exist.
I discovered this randomly while exploring the WN data file.
The new entry would end up looking something like:
<LexicalEntry id="oewn-fun-a"> <Lemma writtenForm="fun" partOfSpeech="a"> <Pronunciation>fʌn</Pronunciation> </Lemma> <Sense id="..." synset="..."/> </LexicalEntry>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't know how one decides which synset is "the best" for this word but here's one possibility:
<Synset id="oewn-01347192-s" ili="i7326" members="oewn-entertaining-a" partOfSpeech="s" lexfile="adj.all"> <Definition>agreeably diverting</Definition> <SynsetRelation relType="similar" target="oewn-01346766-a"/> <Example>an entertaining puppet show</Example> <Example>films should be entertaining</Example> </Synset>
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
I don't have enough experience in WN yet to suggest which synset this should belong to.
The lemma "fun" exists in WN as a partOfSpeech noun but the adjective form does not exist.
I discovered this randomly while exploring the WN data file.
The new entry would end up looking something like:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: