Website redesign

[gconnect]

What this PR does

• Fixes Open Wordnet Documentation website redesign #62
• Changed the header
• Changed the footer
• Modified the side navbar

New Design

[fcbond]

The color is nice, but when I click on a link, it is not aligned properly: instead the first part is hidden. Here is what happens when I click on participle.

[fcbond]

you were asked in the meeting to make the text a little more compact, by e.g. reducing spacing between the formal properties or in the lists of examples. Can you please look into that.

[gconnect]

I will make the above corrections. Thanks for your reviews.

[fcbond]

I thought about this more overnight (it is easier to think with the mock-up, thank you).

• I think the header should be shorter to save screen space
  • can we have "Global wordnet association * Open WordNet Documentation * search" all on the same line
• the colours you have selected are from Princeton's site, and are Princeton Universities colors. I think that might be misleading.
• Let's try and go with blue and grey, like Rohitesh is doing for the OMW
• https://github.com/orgs/globalwordnet/teams/documentation/discussions/11

[fcbond]

For the compression, we could also do it by shifting things around. For example we could go
name 'symbol' (id) ⮀ reverse
short def: short example

e.g.:
Hyponym '⊂' (hyponym ⮀ hypernym)
"a word that is more specific than a given word" --- dog is a hyponym of animal
applicability synset–synset

Domain Topic (domain_topic ⮀ has_domain_topic)
"A concept which is the scientific category pointer of a given concept." --- computer science is a domain topic of CPU
applicability synset–synset; sense–synset; sense–sense

If you can do something clever so that if the screen is too narrow the example starts on a new line, that would be even nicer:

Domain Topic (domain_topic ⮀ has_domain_topic)
"A concept which is the scientific category pointer of a given concept."
--- computer science is a domain topic of CPU
applicability synset–synset; sense–synset; sense–sense

[gconnect]

I think it will be better I go with the color combination from my second mockup. I am not too cool with the color combination from Robitech. Please take a look at the second mockup color again. Mainwhile what is the main color for Global WordNet Association?

[fcbond]

We don;t have a main color. I am ok with the colors from the second mockup.

…

On Sun, Nov 22, 2020 at 3:13 PM Glory Agatevure ***@***.***> wrote: I think it will be better I go with the color combination from my second mockup. I am not too cool with the color combination from Robitech. Please take a look at the second mockup color again. Mainwhile what is the main color for Global WordNet Association? — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#66 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIPZRVVR7L6LNUE2SNP44TSRC2YTANCNFSM4T4RUKNQ> .

-- Francis Bond <http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home/fcbond/> Division of Linguistics and Multilingual Studies Nanyang Technological University

[gconnect]

[gconnect]

For the compression, we could also do it by shifting things around. For example we could go
name 'symbol' (id) ⮀ reverse
short def: short example

e.g.:
Hyponym '⊂' (hyponym ⮀ hypernym)
"a word that is more specific than a given word" --- dog is a hyponym of animal
applicability synset–synset

Domain Topic (domain_topic ⮀ has_domain_topic)
"A concept which is the scientific category pointer of a given concept." --- computer science is a domain topic of CPU
applicability synset–synset; sense–synset; sense–sense

If you can do something clever so that if the screen is too narrow the example starts on a new line, that would be even nicer:

Domain Topic (domain_topic ⮀ has_domain_topic)
"A concept which is the scientific category pointer of a given concept."
--- computer science is a domain topic of CPU
applicability synset–synset; sense–synset; sense–sense

I have made the changes. Using this format.

[fcbond]

Hi,

this is an improvement, but it would be better if:

• the title page stayed at the top
• there was a separator between relations in the main page
• the navbar is much tighter -- maybe lose the lines?
  • on a small screen you can't see the end
• you were going to hide the toc by default (and have it toggleable)

[gconnect]

Hi,

this is an improvement, but it would be better if:

• the title page stayed at the top

• there was a separator between relations in the main page

• the navbar is much tighter -- maybe lose the lines?

  • on a small screen you can't see the end

• you were going to hide the toc by default (and have it toggleable)

I am not quite sure what you meant by the title page staying at the top and adding lose lines to the navbar

[gconnect]

[gconnect]

Hi,

this is an improvement, but it would be better if:

• the title page stayed at the top

• there was a separator between relations in the main page

• the navbar is much tighter -- maybe lose the lines?

  • on a small screen you can't see the end

• you were going to hide the toc by default (and have it toggleable)

I have made the changes.