Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Few PVCs are are failed to create while creating 100 pvcs using script #92

Open
rmadaka opened this issue Nov 6, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Comments

@rmadaka
Copy link

rmadaka commented Nov 6, 2018

Describe the bug
Creating 100 pvcs using script with 30 secs gap , few pvcs are failed to create.

Steps to reproduce
-> Create 100 pvcs uisng script then observe the behavior
Actual results

Error from server (InternalError): error when creating "pvc.yaml": Internal error occurred: resource quota evaluates timeout
persistentvolumeclaim/gcs-pvc44 created
persistentvolumeclaim/gcs-pvc45 created
persistentvolumeclaim/gcs-pvc46 created
Error from server (InternalError): error when creating "pvc.yaml": Internal error occurred: resource quota evaluates timeout
Unable to connect to the server: context deadline exceeded (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)
persistentvolumeclaim/gcs-pvc49 created
persistentvolumeclaim/gcs-pvc50 created
persistentvolumeclaim/gcs-pvc51 created
persistentvolumeclaim/gcs-pvc52 created
Error from server (Timeout): error when creating "pvc.yaml": the server was unable to return a response in the time allotted, but may still be processing the request (post persistentvolumeclaims)
persistentvolumeclaim/gcs-pvc54 created

Expected behavior
All pvcs should be created successfully, all pvcs should be bounded successfully

@Madhu-1
Copy link
Member

Madhu-1 commented Nov 6, 2018

need logs from the CSI provisioner pod

@Madhu-1
Copy link
Member

Madhu-1 commented Nov 23, 2018

@rmadaka ping any update on this?

@amarts
Copy link
Member

amarts commented Nov 23, 2018

Also please see that for dealing with 100 PVC, the memory requirements should be more than the default vm created

@humblec
Copy link
Contributor

humblec commented Nov 23, 2018

@rmadaka if this is still an issue, please give us the logs.

@Madhu-1
Copy link
Member

Madhu-1 commented Nov 26, 2018

@rmadaka any update here?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants