Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

As a curator I would like finder to hit Alkonia tiquanus sp. nov. #141

Closed
mjy opened this issue Jul 13, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

As a curator I would like finder to hit Alkonia tiquanus sp. nov. #141

mjy opened this issue Jul 13, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@mjy
Copy link

mjy commented Jul 13, 2023

Using gem 'biodiversity', github: 'GlobalNamesArchitecture/biodiversity', branch: 'pipe_approach' # '~> 5.1', '>= 5.1.1' the following block of text returns no found names ((nor does the web-version find it):


                                           Alkonia tiquanus sp. nov.
                                        (Figs 1962-1968; Hab.  292)

Female (holotype): length, including ovipositor, 1.18mm; excluding ovipositor, 1.15mm (CPD).
    Head mainly black; vertex generally with a dull, metallic dark green sheen with coppery
@dimus
Copy link
Member

dimus commented Jul 17, 2023

I think the idea here is to have an option to detect names which are not registered in gnverifier database yet, but do contain an annotation like 'sp. nov.' and such.
I would say that by default it should be off, because it would generate false positives, but it should be available as an option in cases when the Users knows what they are doing

@dimus
Copy link
Member

dimus commented Jul 17, 2023

part of #143

@dimus dimus closed this as completed Jul 17, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants