Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

authentik_host vs authentik_host_browser for embedded outpost? #12738

Open
itskagee opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

authentik_host vs authentik_host_browser for embedded outpost? #12738

itskagee opened this issue Jan 20, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@itskagee
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

I am a bit confused about those two options.

As far as I could understand from this: docs, authentik_host is used by the outpost to connect to Authentik, while authentik_host_browser is used for user facing operations.

So going by this, I set these up as follows:
authentik_host: https://localhost:9443
authentik_host_browser: https://auth.<domain>.<tld>

However, when I use Authentik in Forward Auth (single application) mode, after entering my credentials, the webpage redirects to the localhost address set by authentik_host, instead of going to the FQDN set by authentik_host_browser.

I expected the redirect to go to authentik_host_browser, since this is a user facing operation.

Have I misunderstood the documentation, or am I setting something wrong?

Using the FQDN in authentik_host results in correct redirects and a successful authentication, but I'd like it if the outpost didn't have to go out and come back in to connect to something to which it can connect internally.

Relevant info
Reverse Proxy: Caddy

Screenshots

Logs

Version and Deployment (please complete the following information):

  • authentik version: 2024.12.2
  • Deployment: docker-compose

Additional context

@itskagee itskagee added the question Further information is requested label Jan 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant