You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I latexify something like x**(1/p), I get $x^{1/p}$, which makes complete sense, but isn't quite as nice looking as $\sqrt[p]{x}$.
Ideas of the solution
Is there a way to coax latexify to look for patterns like 1/expr in the exponent, and use sqrt[expr] in those cases?
Alternative ideas
having a flag for the latexify decorator that renders all powers p as sqrt[1/p] would probably still be useful if the fully automatic version isn't possible
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the suggestion. It is basically possible to implement the ideas above, but we also need to carefully choose the default behavior.
I think introducing some flags (such as ensure_root_op?) to choose the representation $\sqrt[p]{x}$ for x**(1/p) is better. Using $x^{\frac{1}{p}}$ by default (the current behavior) would be more consistent because users can easily guess that every case of x**(q/p) will be literally converted to $x^{\frac{q}{p}}$ if the users asked nothing.
Description
When I latexify something like
x**(1/p)
, I get$x^{1/p}$
, which makes complete sense, but isn't quite as nice looking as$\sqrt[p]{x}$
.Ideas of the solution
Is there a way to coax latexify to look for patterns like
1/expr
in the exponent, and usesqrt[expr]
in those cases?Alternative ideas
having a flag for the latexify decorator that renders all powers
p
assqrt[1/p]
would probably still be useful if the fully automatic version isn't possibleAdditional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: