We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is this a typo or deliberate? This line checked the listen fd (3), instead of accepted fd (4)?
https://github.com/google/packetdrill/blob/master/gtests/net/tcp/inq/server.pkt#L50
I guess the original purpose is to check this?
+0 read(4, ..., 2000) = 0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the report! We'll try to fix this. Or please feel free to post a patch. Thanks!
Sorry, something went wrong.
packetdrill: check accepted fd instead of listen fd
b52e928
It makes more sense to check the acceptd fd instead of listen fd in this test case. Fixes google#70. Signed-off-by: Jianfeng Tan <[email protected]>
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Is this a typo or deliberate? This line checked the listen fd (3), instead of accepted fd (4)?
https://github.com/google/packetdrill/blob/master/gtests/net/tcp/inq/server.pkt#L50
I guess the original purpose is to check this?
+0 read(4, ..., 2000) = 0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: