consider removing required $name
parameter from OperationsClient::listOperations
#500
Labels
priority: p2
Moderately-important priority. Fix may not be included in next release.
type: feature request
‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
There are five APIs which allow calls to
listOperations
without a$name
parameter:Out of these APIs, only
VideoIntelligence
provides bindings for callinglistOperations
with a$name
parameter.Because of this, it would be better to make the
$name
parameter toOperationsClient::listOperations
optional, and throw an exception when it's required (I believe the API would handle throwing this exception anyway). Otherwise, users are forced to provide this parameter when it isn't necessary and/or supported.It looks like the
ListOperationsRequest
proto does not require the$name
parameter, so I believe this is as a result of the parameter moving from required to optional, and we will just have to fix it in the next version (or add a way for the generator to make these parameters optional)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: