You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are actually several reasons why this might happen. Let me explain what it takes for the sample to be "interesting". When Jackalope processes a sample and it triggers new coverage, Jackalope reruns the sample a certain number of times (10 by default). Only samples that have stable coverage (some part of coverage that is seen for each run with this sample) are considered interesting. In other words, we are looking for coverage that is specific to the sample in question and not e.g. initialization code etc. The samples that only produce variable coverage (coverage that is seen in one or some iterations but not all) are discarded. Additionally, for a sample to be considered interesting, none of the repeated runs with the sample must cause a crash or a hang.
Hi ifratric,
On macOS, using litecov can generate coverage file, and shows log such as:
Found 1701 new offsets in ...
but with the same instrument_module and input file, Jackalope shows:
Why's that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: