Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 9, 2021. It is now read-only.

Module suggestion: ckeditor_templates #120

Closed
rooby opened this issue Oct 9, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

Module suggestion: ckeditor_templates #120

rooby opened this issue Oct 9, 2018 · 6 comments

Comments

@rooby
Copy link

rooby commented Oct 9, 2018

It would be good to be able to use the ckeditor_templates module.

Equivalent functionality was available in the D7 version of GovCMS.

@rooby
Copy link
Author

rooby commented Oct 9, 2018

Optionally, there is a module for managing templates via the UI - ckeditor_templates_ui, which was not available in the D7 GovCMS.

@murraywoodman
Copy link

I think something like this would be very helpful. In another issue I made a low priority suggestion for ckeditor_responsive_plugin but upon reflectioon going for something more general like this would be better. There are some UI Kit components which would be well suited to this kind of approach (grids, keyword list, progress indicator, alerts, callouts, etc). If this module were adopted a standard set of templates could be developed to use it. NB. I haven't actullay used the module can't really comment on its efficacy. The concept is good though.

@gargsuchi
Copy link
Contributor

Or maybe this module - https://www.drupal.org/project/wysiwyg_template

@simesy
Copy link
Contributor

simesy commented Nov 4, 2018

+1 to wysiwyg_template

@Belhendo
Copy link

Hi all, apologies for the lack of response from us on this one. If you're interested in a wysiwyg_template, could you please complete the new module request template here, create a new issue with it and we can review it and respond: https://github.com/govCMS/govCMS8/blob/1.x/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/module-request.md

Thank you!

@simesy
Copy link
Contributor

simesy commented Apr 8, 2020

See #440

@simesy simesy closed this as completed Apr 8, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants