Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOCS] typo #10965

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025
Merged

[DOCS] typo #10965

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

klavavej
Copy link
Contributor

This issueless PR fixes a typo reported in slack

  • Description of PR changes above includes a link to an existing GitHub issue
  • PR title is prefixed with one of: [BUGFIX], [FEATURE], [DOCS], [MAINTENANCE], [CONTRIB]
  • Code is linted - run invoke lint (uses ruff format + ruff check)
  • Appropriate tests and docs have been updated

For more information about contributing, visit our community resources.

After you submit your PR, keep the page open and monitor the statuses of the various checks made by our continuous integration process at the bottom of the page. Please fix any issues that come up and reach out on Slack if you need help. Thanks for contributing!

Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Deploy Preview for niobium-lead-7998 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 3db6bd2
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/niobium-lead-7998/deploys/67bcefd9f3eeea000823c4d6
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-10965.docs.greatexpectations.io
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.84%. Comparing base (d4dc22d) to head (3db6bd2).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop   #10965   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    80.84%   80.84%           
========================================
  Files          471      471           
  Lines        40790    40790           
========================================
  Hits         32976    32976           
  Misses        7814     7814           
Flag Coverage Δ
3.10 70.24% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
3.10 athena or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds 56.55% <ø> (?)
3.10 aws_deps 46.51% <ø> (?)
3.10 big 54.96% <ø> (?)
3.10 bigquery 48.74% <ø> (?)
3.10 clickhouse 43.41% <ø> (?)
3.10 databricks 50.51% <ø> (?)
3.10 filesystem 63.01% <ø> (?)
3.10 mssql 51.51% <ø> (?)
3.10 mysql 51.89% <ø> (?)
3.10 postgresql 54.61% <ø> (?)
3.10 snowflake 51.26% <ø> (?)
3.10 spark 57.93% <ø> (?)
3.10 spark_connect 46.83% <ø> (?)
3.10 trino 52.43% <ø> (?)
3.11 70.24% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
3.11 athena or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds 56.55% <ø> (?)
3.11 aws_deps 46.51% <ø> (?)
3.11 big 54.96% <ø> (?)
3.11 bigquery 48.74% <ø> (?)
3.11 clickhouse 43.41% <ø> (?)
3.11 databricks 50.51% <ø> (?)
3.11 filesystem 63.01% <ø> (?)
3.11 mssql 51.51% <ø> (?)
3.11 mysql 51.89% <ø> (?)
3.11 postgresql 54.61% <ø> (?)
3.11 snowflake 51.26% <ø> (?)
3.11 spark 57.93% <ø> (?)
3.11 spark_connect 46.83% <ø> (?)
3.11 trino 52.43% <ø> (?)
3.12 70.22% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️
3.12 athena or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds 56.56% <ø> (ø)
3.12 aws_deps 46.51% <ø> (ø)
3.12 big 54.96% <ø> (ø)
3.12 bigquery 48.74% <ø> (ø)
3.12 databricks 50.51% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
3.12 filesystem 63.01% <ø> (ø)
3.12 mssql 51.52% <ø> (ø)
3.12 mysql 51.89% <ø> (ø)
3.12 postgresql 54.61% <ø> (ø)
3.12 snowflake 51.26% <ø> (ø)
3.12 spark 57.93% <ø> (ø)
3.12 spark_connect 46.83% <ø> (ø)
3.12 trino 52.44% <ø> (ø)
3.9 70.26% <ø> (+0.01%) ⬆️
3.9 athena or openpyxl or pyarrow or project or sqlite or aws_creds 56.56% <ø> (ø)
3.9 aws_deps 46.53% <ø> (ø)
3.9 big 54.97% <ø> (ø)
3.9 bigquery 48.74% <ø> (ø)
3.9 clickhouse 43.43% <ø> (ø)
3.9 databricks 50.51% <ø> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
3.9 filesystem 63.01% <ø> (ø)
3.9 mssql 51.50% <ø> (ø)
3.9 mysql 51.87% <ø> (ø)
3.9 postgresql 54.60% <ø> (ø)
3.9 snowflake 51.26% <ø> (ø)
3.9 spark 57.90% <ø> (ø)
3.9 spark_connect 46.84% <ø> (ø)
3.9 trino 52.42% <ø> (ø)
cloud 0.00% <ø> (ø)
docs-basic 54.03% <ø> (ø)
docs-creds-needed 52.91% <ø> (ø)
docs-spark 52.46% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

…ose_a_result_format/_result_output_reference_table.md
@klavavej klavavej marked this pull request as ready for review February 24, 2025 22:22
@klavavej klavavej requested a review from sujensen February 24, 2025 22:22
Copy link
Contributor

@sujensen sujensen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@klavavej klavavej added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 24, 2025
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 1dbcf99 Feb 25, 2025
119 checks passed
@klavavej klavavej deleted the klavavej-patch-1 branch February 25, 2025 00:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants