Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Library should not us the Ti namespace #3

Open
rblalock opened this issue Sep 23, 2011 · 3 comments
Open

Library should not us the Ti namespace #3

rblalock opened this issue Sep 23, 2011 · 3 comments

Comments

@rblalock
Copy link

First, awesome library and great idea. Second, you should use another namespace other than the Ti namespace. Anything with the Ti namespace is subject to change and could break anything you try to add to it. Don't look at it as a true javascript object.

I recommend doing this as a CommonJS module so a user can require() it and call it whatever he wants (while protecting the module's scope).

Great job on this.

@ordinz
Copy link

ordinz commented Sep 23, 2011

+1. This looks awesome, good job!

@x-ji
Copy link

x-ji commented Dec 16, 2014

Yeah not to mention currently Ti.include is actually already deprecated. CommonJS module is a must. Great library though. Probably someone else has to pick up the work here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants
@ordinz @rblalock @x-ji and others