Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reconsidering instance sharing #361

Open
guybedford opened this issue Feb 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Reconsidering instance sharing #361

guybedford opened this issue Feb 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@guybedford
Copy link
Owner

Now that we have full native support, we may well need to reconsider the instance sharing question for this project with the native loader, and especially if this project continues to polyfill new modules features going forward.

That is, instead of treating the polyfill loader as entirely disjoint, it will be more and more common now to have varying subgraphs which use different new modules features.

One approach here might be to separate into two projects - a pure import maps polyfill only, and a new experimental project for new modules features.

If we go with the two build concept, then the polyfill should continue to use its own loader for performance, while the new project would be fully shared with the native loader.

For background on the performance issue see #208.

@guybedford guybedford added the question Further information is requested label Feb 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant