-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create Table: project_program_area_xref #45
Comments
ETA: September 1, 6 PM |
Most xref tables can created automatically by Django, so this issue needs to be rewritten to define the many to many relationship. |
After slack messaging with @del9ra, we realized that probably none of the xref tables can use the "through" table generated by Django, because the generated table won't contain the In any case, that means this issue does still need to implement a new model. |
Variations of
@fyliu I didn't implement a new model in my new PR #398 ; I just added a |
I think we need to discuss with @Neecolaa on using the same name and type for the xref table to mark when the relationship ended. Adding "ready for DB Architect" and will add an item to the next meeting. @del9ra I think we do need to add the xref model just because the |
@fyliu #376 (comment) Here you said:
|
Overview
We need to create the project_program_area_xref table so that we can update a shared data store across hackforla.org, vrms, civictechjobs, and tables (onboarding) project.
Details
A table and a model are the same thing
Action Items
Resources/Instructions
Description
Join table: links project to program area
Data Fields
Copied from spreadsheet and checked off according to ERD. (unchecked items indicate a mismatch between ERD and spreadsheet, which requires a review)
In ERD only (having items here indicates a mismatch, which requires a review)
Associated Tables
Copied from spreadsheet and checked off according to ERD. (unchecked items indicate a mismatch between ERD and spreadsheet, which requires a review)
In ERD only (having items here indicates a mismatch, which requires a review)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: