You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
From this limitation, conditions with nested OR cannot be expressed easily, such as:
🚫 (F && (G || H) && (J || K))
As I understand it, state transitions naturally follow/allow for Sum Of Products boolean expressions. (each transition contains a number of ANDs between different conditions, and then you can OR the result of each transition together). Since any boolean expression can be rewritten into a Sum Of Products (SOP) form, we should be able to take any expression, rewrite it in SOP form, then generate the transitions accordingly.
Finding a SOP expression given an arbitrary expression shouldn't be too difficult, i think. Finding the optimal SOP expression is likely out of scope.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As I understand it, state transitions naturally follow/allow for Sum Of Products boolean expressions. (each transition contains a number of ANDs between different conditions, and then you can OR the result of each transition together). Since any boolean expression can be rewritten into a Sum Of Products (SOP) form, we should be able to take any expression, rewrite it in SOP form, then generate the transitions accordingly.
Finding a SOP expression given an arbitrary expression shouldn't be too difficult, i think. Finding the optimal SOP expression is likely out of scope.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: