Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Investigate Continuous Joint #36

Open
Lexseal opened this issue Nov 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Investigate Continuous Joint #36

Lexseal opened this issue Nov 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Lexseal
Copy link
Collaborator

Lexseal commented Nov 21, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Does it work and how is represented?
@Lexseal
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Lexseal commented Dec 8, 2023

Yes, it does work in OMPL. The SO2 object correctly represents the joint rotation. If we were to support this in constrained planning, then it is indeed possible to have two numbers $u, v$ to represent the angle and make sure $arccos(u)=arcsin(v)$ as a secondary constraint.

@KolinGuo KolinGuo added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Lexseal @KolinGuo