You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for the source code sharing. I re-train the model in story generation task on Writingprompts dataset using almost same config (except less GPUs) and your provided .bpe files. My goal is to evaluate the test perplexity as reported in Table 3 of your paper.
However, the only way I find promising seems not working: the OpenNMT library in your code can evaluate "GOLD score" for the target sequences. The GOLD score is printed after running 'python translate.py' with given target. However, I got unreasonable PPL results as following:
PRED AVG SCORE: -0.0040, PRED PPL: 1.0040
GOLD AVG SCORE: -9.7727, GOLD PPL: 17548.5739
The GOLD scores are incredibly high. I am wondering how you evaluate the PPL just as you reported in Table 3. Whether or not you would like to share this evaluation code in the repository? Many thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the source code sharing. I re-train the model in story generation task on Writingprompts dataset using almost same config (except less GPUs) and your provided .bpe files. My goal is to evaluate the test perplexity as reported in Table 3 of your paper.
However, the only way I find promising seems not working: the OpenNMT library in your code can evaluate "GOLD score" for the target sequences. The GOLD score is printed after running 'python translate.py' with given target. However, I got unreasonable PPL results as following:
PRED AVG SCORE: -0.0040, PRED PPL: 1.0040
GOLD AVG SCORE: -9.7727, GOLD PPL: 17548.5739
The GOLD scores are incredibly high. I am wondering how you evaluate the PPL just as you reported in Table 3. Whether or not you would like to share this evaluation code in the repository? Many thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: