You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Aside from being (supposedly) faster than slirp4netns, it should support inter-container networking better. Allowing things like sidecars and Nomad inter task communication.
Before all that, I am trying to gauge support. So, is pasta rootless networking in line with the project?
In terms of implementation, even though it is the default in Podman > 5, I am thinking of requiring explicit boolean in plugin config to toggle it on. It also requires the pasta binary to be present in podman's info output.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am looking to implement pasta usermode networking for rootless containers. Pasta is a replacement of
slirp4netns
.See https://docs.podman.io/en/latest/markdown/podman-run.1.html#network-mode-net (scroll down to
pasta[:OPTIONS,…]
).Aside from being (supposedly) faster than
slirp4netns
, it should support inter-container networking better. Allowing things like sidecars and Nomad inter task communication.Before all that, I am trying to gauge support. So, is pasta rootless networking in line with the project?
In terms of implementation, even though it is the default in Podman > 5, I am thinking of requiring explicit boolean in plugin config to toggle it on. It also requires the pasta binary to be present in podman's info output.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: