You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It might be worth inverting the "markless" judgment to something of a "marked" judgment which would give that an expression has some mark within it.
This would make the current doubly negated statements in Theorem A.3, etc. rather easier to read and understand. That is, instead of, for example, "it is not the case that ě markless", we would have just that "ě marked".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
mirryi
changed the title
Consider inverting markless judgment
Consider inverting the "markless" judgment(s) into "marked" judgment(s)
Jun 8, 2023
mirryi
changed the title
Consider inverting the "markless" judgment(s) into "marked" judgment(s)
formalism + agda: onsider inverting the "markless" judgment(s) into "marked" judgment(s)
Jul 3, 2023
mirryi
changed the title
formalism + agda: onsider inverting the "markless" judgment(s) into "marked" judgment(s)
formalism + agda: Consider inverting the "markless" judgment(s) into "marked" judgment(s)
Jul 3, 2023
It might be worth inverting the "markless" judgment to something of a "marked" judgment which would give that an expression has some mark within it.
This would make the current doubly negated statements in Theorem A.3, etc. rather easier to read and understand. That is, instead of, for example, "it is not the case that ě markless", we would have just that "ě marked".
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: