Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No amd64 package #2

Open
gnuday opened this issue Feb 23, 2013 · 2 comments
Open

No amd64 package #2

gnuday opened this issue Feb 23, 2013 · 2 comments

Comments

@gnuday
Copy link

gnuday commented Feb 23, 2013

Hi,

Is there any reason why the Debian package has only been built for i386 architecture? Is there anything else I need to do to safely rebuild the package for amd64 other than mod the control file and set Architecture to amd64?

Thanks.

Regards,
John

@hbarnard
Copy link
Owner

Hi again John

I do not believe so, since most/all of it is pure Perl, but I haven't
tried. If you get some results, please tell me/everyone!

Best regards Hugh

On 23 February 2013 19:14, gnuday [email protected] wrote:

Hi,

Is there any reason why the Debian package has only been built for i386
architecture? Is there anything else I need to do to safely rebuild the
package for amd64 other than mod the control file and set Architecture to
amd64?

Thanks.

Regards,
John


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/2.

http://www.hughbarnard.org
http://www.twitter.com/hughbarnard
http://www.big-wave-heuristics.com/
http://www.hackney-environment-network.org.uk/

@gnuday
Copy link
Author

gnuday commented Feb 24, 2013

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

This worked.

Thanks.

Regards,
John

On 23/02/13 19:26, Hugh Barnard wrote:

Hi again John

I do not believe so, since most/all of it is pure Perl, but I haven't
tried. If you get some results, please tell me/everyone!

Best regards Hugh

On 23 February 2013 19:14, gnuday [email protected] wrote:

Hi,

Is there any reason why the Debian package has only been built for i386
architecture? Is there anything else I need to do to safely rebuild the
package for amd64 other than mod the control file and set Architecture to
amd64?

Thanks.

Regards,
John


Reply to this email directly or view it on
GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/2.

http://www.hughbarnard.org
http://www.twitter.com/hughbarnard
http://www.big-wave-heuristics.com/
http://www.hackney-environment-network.org.uk/


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#2 (comment).

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=KKQN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants