Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QC: Number of cells per image #79

Open
tischi opened this issue May 13, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

QC: Number of cells per image #79

tischi opened this issue May 13, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator

tischi commented May 13, 2020

Hi @metavibor
cc @constantinpape

I am posting here few examples, I think this is the best to decide what still looks acceptable to you...

350 cells

image

580 cells

image

706 cells

image

1877 cells

image

@metavibor
Copy link
Collaborator

wow 1877 cells in one image :) ... also I find it unbelievable that there are as many as 350 cells in the first image... I would say there are no more than 100 on the first glance... it is amazing how bad one can be in estimating that
I think I would go with an absolute maxiumum of 1000 cells (I would even lower it further but I know we will lose whole plates if we do that....) we got more plates in the meantime so from now on I will not use anything that has too many cells and than we can lower the maximum to 800

@constantinpape
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, I will re-enable some qc including min/max cells per image and I will start with a thousand.
(I will also reactivate the cell sizes, but start with more conservative values now.)

@tischi
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tischi commented May 14, 2020

also I find it unbelievable that there are as many as 350 cells in the first image... I would say there are no more than 100 on the first glance...

I think I read once that 5 objects is the maximum number that humans can correctly identify "at a glance", everything more we need to actually count 😄

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants